Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-184.58.159.118-20130905114258/@comment-65.246.63.68-20130905172156

Ranoake wrote: 65.246.63.68 wrote: Ranoake wrote: This is all speculation,...

Why dont you just stop there....??? it completely sums up both sides of the "debate"... No it does not, because your 'side' is not 'equivalent' to my side. I am not speculating. I am observing the data and making calculations and pointing out that a 10 streak of all alts or all bots is not unlikely to happen in a community of this size possibly several times. I pointed out that all the results we are seeing so far is consistent with a 50/50 assumption and that the farther from 50/50 you go the less likely it is to be true because the data does not support it.

Your 'points' are not equally valid. You provide no math, just conjecture and wild theories without providing any proof that the evidence we have supports that theory or at least does not contradict it.

Dude, i give up. You have no more data than anyone else. You dont have any idea if its a "true" 50/50 nor does anyone else.

You arnt providing any math.. you're provide basic probability information that anyone who completed highschool should know, which, btw, no one is arguing, but is meaningless without knowing the coded odds. (which, by your own statement above, you dont know)

As far as my "wild theories", i dont see a single post of mine claiming anything in that regard other than any mentions to us having no idea what the coding is behind the numbers.

People come to these threads to post their results and generally bitch about their "bad luck", Nothing more.

I shouldnt have even wasted my time after reading your posts on other threads here.