Thread:Prescoper/@comment-9605025-20130812205407

Off-topic:

Perhaps, but it was in response to several previous posts by other users.

Describe:

1) The incident with Roanoke which was verified by Greygoose963.

2) Combination of the following.

a) Vague descriptions such as "insulted".

b) No public record to support admin claims.

c) No recourse except for other admins.

d) On several occasions, I have tried to engage in discussion about various issues on chat. In doing so, those with opposing views would tend to gang up on me at least by irreasonably demanding evidence/examples or claiming that provided examples are not applicable despite little to no difference in overall concept. Often times they would demand a level of detail from me that they insist they don't have to provide themselves. There is also the issue of the use of derogatory phrases such as "how dumb can you be?", "are you stupid?", "are you on crack?". Also, there are responses which show that the sender intends to brush off the points put forward and push forward with their own. An example would be "invalid, try again". I have had this happen with some particularly high ranking players and yet not so much as a kick has happened. 