Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-11590835-20130823185331/@comment-11217537-20130828015231

The top post has a lot of good points. The questionable legality of the "gambling" issue is real.

I am a little late into this debate here regarding using the deck after refund. My take is that only Starscream knows what he lost from Mobage vs. what was refunded. I am not going to question that he plays with his deck even though he got some refund. I cannot know what was spent to get the lost rewards. Now, if there had been a full refund, yet continued play with that deck after, I would say that is not right. It would be obvious that he is using a deck that he didn't pay for and that deck affects other players in that scenario. Regardless, it would not be theft for whoever brought up that term.

The only thing I disagree with Starscream is his take on the triviality of evaluating someone based upon actions in a game. To quote Sir Thomas More in "A Man for All Seasons"

"Why, Richard, it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world... but for Wales?"

Good to see you back playing.