Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-11590835-20130808070152/@comment-11297866-20130812114224

Andrewds1021 wrote:

With that said, I would like to point out that there are many trading card games produced by many big, well-known companies. One of these, separate from the other point, is Nickelodeon. I'll say again, the gambling claim doesnt hold water IMHO.

As you mention, this is common practice for most card games with premium currency. People seemed to be pissed here bc the odds are so very low in favor of the player.

Of all the things wrong with this game, the "gambling aspect" is the least wrong as it clearly states the "horrible" odds an people still choose to pay for chances.

If you were a dev... why would you change it? People continue to pay at horrible odds?

IMHO there are 2 issuess here... The complaints about game performance, design, playability is point 1 and buyer's remorse over how much people have spent on a game with all those issues is point 2.