Board Thread:Game Discussion/@comment-11165765-20131108091245/@comment-13129747-20131110203620

Godofcyanide wrote: I'm hoping to receive a similar statement soon for my letter sent Saturday morning.

I don't expect them to compensate people for missing T1, as there are a lot of variables to work with there. Also, how do you determine how many people deserve compensation? Let's say they expand it to the top 105... Then #106 will have a reasonable complaint.

That they are at least reconsidering the suspension length does bring some hope.

Mobage knows who cheated. They know where everybody finished. It wouldn't be a stretch to re-calculate final standings of events by deleting those entries that are know cheaters. They don't need to expand the top 100 to 110 or 1xx. The adjusted standings should be rewarded properly.

It gets even fuzzier when you take into account the luck on the spacebridge. Considering that it should be "random", the cheater than may have used rubies on the SB could have taken the randomly generated card that the next person in line needed.

Just like horse races where the winner may be disqualified and the remaining racers move up a notch, Mobage should be looking at compensating those that got screwed. Image the guy who finished 101, now knowing full well he got screwed. I'd be wanting my just rewards (well, that is provided he/she didn't cheat too! :-))